[02:51:36] <Baastuul> EMBAR.
[07:01:54] --- Ember is now known as Darke
[08:59:25] --- Colourless is now known as Cless|Away
[09:24:41] <Fl00der> hi
[09:26:26] <Fl00der> servus: anything new to exult3D? :)
[12:37:14] --- Cless|Away is now known as Colourless
[13:11:24] <Lord_Nightmare> servus: i can't access your site...
[13:33:49] <Fl00der> servus has own site? :o
[14:57:30] <Vigil> Good afternoon! Is anyone around?
[14:57:53] <Fl00der> yes
[14:57:57] <Fl00der> for a while
[14:57:59] <Baastuul> I'm here, but I'm going to be gone in less than a few minutes. :(
[14:58:10] <Fl00der> same :)
[14:58:33] <Baastuul> My three-day weekend has ended and I must head back to the school. :(
[14:58:49] <Vigil> My 6-month weekend still isn't over, so I'm afraid I can't sympathise ;)
[14:58:55] <Fl00der> :D
[14:59:05] <Vigil> Anyway, I suppose I had better be quick. I posted a thread on the forums asking if there could be a newer version of the Exult Tools snapshot
[14:59:24] <Vigil> Since I am doing some usecoding and the version of ucc I have (from july 04) appears to suck
[15:00:02] <Vigil> And since I'm coding right now, I figured coming on here might get me a quicker answer :)
[15:02:35] <Colourless> i doubt terribly much if anything has been done to the compiler since then..
[15:04:53] <Vigil> Well, according to the changelogs there's been a lot of added intrinsics and a new converse structure or two
[15:05:31] <Vigil> (for instance, my version of ucc doesn't even support the converse { case: } structure mentioned in the ucc.txt documentation that came with the tools ;)
[15:07:16] <Vigil> Anyway, I figure those changes have to have occurred to the ucc sourcecode, since they're just implementing different ways to specify the same end result (in the compiled code)
[15:08:53] <Colourless> are you sure? i don't see i in the changelog
[15:09:20] <Vigil> lesseee....
[15:09:50] --- Baastuul_ is now known as Baastuul
[15:10:05] <Vigil> No, you're absolutely right. I wasn't checking dates.
[15:11:18] <Vigil> In which case, I guess it's just that the documentation is from the future ;)
[15:12:08] <Vigil> Is there any way then to remap previously-unknown intrinsics? For instance, 0x80 appears to close the gump for the specified container
[15:12:25] <Vigil> But is currently unknown
[15:12:29] <Colourless> converse (["Answer1", "Answer2"]) { case "Answer1": }
[15:12:31] <Colourless> should work
[15:12:47] <Colourless> all the intrinsics should also be implemented...
[15:12:51] <Vigil> Hrm, does the case not work with answers added through UI_add_answer()?
[15:13:27] <Vigil> Really? There's a great many UNKNOWN ones, looking at u7bgintrinsics.data
[15:13:29] <Colourless> you probably shouldn't mess with that
[15:14:01] <Vigil> Ahh, ok. I assumed converse() was a shortcut for those intrinsics, rather than using a different approach.
[15:16:03] <Vigil> by all the intrinsics should be implemented, do you mean that all of them should have proper UI_func() names? Or is there a way to call UNKNOWN intrinsics?
[15:16:16] * Colourless shrugs
[15:16:24] <Colourless> i don't know much about the compiler
[15:16:34] <Colourless> but as far as i know, they should all be implemented
[15:17:37] <Vigil> Hm. Well, thanks all the same.
[15:17:52] <Vigil> And thanks for clarifying the converse structure too :)
[15:18:22] <Vigil> Seeya later