[02:04:18] &lt;<font color="#0000C0">Copernican</font>&gt; i think i've found a bug, maybe not<BR>
[02:04:36] &lt;<font color="#0000C0">Copernican</font>&gt; i'm running exult 1.2 on os x<BR>
[02:05:28] &lt;<font color="#0000C0">Copernican</font>&gt; the docs state that exult no longer needs the paths of the sfx packs spelled out in exult.cfg, e.g., &lt;waves&gt;exult_bg.sfx&lt;/waves&gt;<BR>
[02:05:43] &lt;<font color="#0000C0">Copernican</font>&gt; but the sfx do not work unless you actually include that line<BR>
[02:06:10] &lt;<font color="#0000C0">Copernican</font>&gt; maybe exult is looking for jmsfx.flx, not exult_bg.flx<BR>
[02:06:24] &lt;<font color="#0000C0">Copernican</font>&gt; anyway, the behavior does not match the docs<BR>
[02:06:29] &lt;<font color="#0000C0">Copernican</font>&gt; more importantly<BR>
[02:06:52] &lt;<font color="#0000C0">Copernican</font>&gt; the engine spits out messages like "SFX 109 is out of range"<BR>
[02:07:00] &lt;<font color="#0000C0">Copernican</font>&gt; and i am not hearing sfx<BR>
[02:07:17] &lt;<font color="#0000C0">Copernican</font>&gt; for example, when i click on the vital stats icon, i should hear a little effect<BR>
[02:07:24] &lt;<font color="#0000C0">Copernican</font>&gt; but i get one of those "out of range" messages<BR>
[02:07:59] &lt;<font color="#0000C0">Copernican</font>&gt; am i doing something incorrectly, or should i submit a bug?<BR>
[07:09:58] &lt;<font color="#0000C0">servus</font>&gt; Wee, working 80 hours a week and I manage time to work on Exult3D :)<BR>
[07:10:37] &lt;<font color="#0000C0">servus</font>&gt; I'm going to remerge it with a fresh CVS CO soon, then just diff. Still leaves the megs and megs of data, though, of course.<BR>
[07:11:36] &lt;<font color="#0000C0">servus</font>&gt; Camera is being locked down to isometric, by the way, with 45 degrees of freedom from being top-down, and a 75' FoV for now.<BR>
[08:11:39] &lt;<font color="#B0B0B0">Colourless</font>&gt; Copernican: exult should be looking for the sfx flexes in the data dir. if you put them somewhere else thn you'll need to specify the path<BR>
[09:56:35] &lt;<font color="#0000C0">Flooder</font>&gt; yo<BR>
[10:23:51] &lt;<font color="#0000C0">Flooder</font>&gt; when I'm here. nobody will talk :)<BR>
[10:29:45] &lt;<font color="#0000C0">Sevalecan</font>&gt; &lt;-- nobody<BR>
[10:30:34] &lt;<font color="#0000C0">Flooder</font>&gt; :P<BR>
[18:03:06] &lt;<font color="#0000C0">Copernican</font>&gt; colourless: the sfx files are in the data dir<BR>
[18:03:22] &lt;<font color="#0000C0">Copernican</font>&gt; that's my point<BR>
[18:03:41] &lt;<font color="#0000C0">Copernican</font>&gt; the docs say you shouldn't have to explicitly set the paths<BR>
[18:03:47] &lt;<font color="#0000C0">Copernican</font>&gt; but it doesn't work unless i do<BR>
[18:03:57] &lt;<font color="#0000C0">Copernican</font>&gt; and i'm wondering if this is an os x quirk<BR>
[18:34:17] &lt;<font color="#800080">wjp</font>&gt; does it say anything about finding or not finding the digital sfx file at startup?<BR>
[18:35:28] &lt;<font color="#800080">wjp</font>&gt; hm, and you say it does work if you specify a full path?<BR>
[18:36:13] &lt;<font color="#800080">wjp</font>&gt; oh, maybe I see where the confusion is: it doesn't need the _path_ of the SFX file if it's in Exult's data dir<BR>
[18:36:18] &lt;<font color="#800080">wjp</font>&gt; you still need to specify the filename<BR>