[00:47:06] <Wolfspirit> anyone alive in here?
[01:33:41] <wjp> I'm here now
[01:33:57] <wjp> although not for long... somehow that sneaky time managed to get to 3:30am without me noticing :-)
[01:34:07] <wjp> hi Kirben
[01:34:30] <Kirben> Hi
[01:37:53] <wjp> time to go... way too late here :-)
[05:26:55] * Eclair is away: MANGA TIME!!!
[07:40:32] <Colourless> you are not sleeping
[07:41:50] <sbx> no, im not
[08:05:07] * DarkeZzz denies!
[08:48:02] <sbx> DarkeZzz: twm icewm blackboxwm!
[08:50:52] <DarkeZzz> sbx: Thanks!
[08:56:17] <Colourless> got to go
[10:18:41] <DarkeZzz> Greetings.
[12:03:14] <DarkeZzz> Hiya.
[12:04:16] <wjp> hi
[12:05:01] <Colourless> hi
[12:05:20] <DarkeZzz> Hello.
[12:07:50] <Colourless> so, have you actually gotten out of bed today, or are you just too lazy to actually change your nick?
[12:16:57] <DarkeZzz> Hmm... forgetful I think. *grin*
[12:16:59] --- DarkeZzz is now known as Darke
[12:17:34] * Darke *ahem* can't remember if he's too forgetful or not.
[12:17:49] <Colourless> well, at least I know iom forgetful
[14:46:20] <wjp> lol: according to this bugtraq post the following html will crash IE: "<html><form><input type crash></form></html>" :-)
[14:47:00] <wjp> sounds kind of hard to believe, though :-)
[14:47:08] <Colourless> hah, lets find out
[14:47:51] <Colourless> was there supposed to an equal between type and crash?
[14:48:07] <Colourless> well that did crash ie
[14:48:09] <wjp> no
[14:48:14] <wjp> wow
[14:48:54] <wjp> I'm impressed :-)
[14:48:56] <Colourless> it appears that ie doesn't like the missing equal sign.
[14:49:05] <wjp> makes you wonder what the <input> parsing code looks like :-)
[14:49:05] <Colourless> the 'crash' word can be changed to anything
[14:49:18] * wjp nods; I suspected as much
[14:49:32] <Colourless> even crashes with just <input type<
[14:49:34] <Colourless> <input type>
[14:49:57] <wjp> does it work if you leave out the <html> and <form> tags?
[14:49:58] <Colourless> (that is all that's in the document)
[14:50:10] <wjp> k :-)
[14:50:44] <Colourless> the problem is... accessing a null pointer
[14:50:58] <Darke> Heh.
[14:51:22] <Colourless> my guess. not checking the return from malloc
[14:51:50] <Colourless> of course it could be something else
[14:52:08] <Colourless> i imagine it will be a simple fix
[14:52:24] <wjp> yeah, most likely
[14:52:31] <Darke> Doesn't matter. Not like anyone will actually know, or care to. *grin*
[14:53:06] <Colourless> and it's not a 'critical' security problem at least, not as far as I can tell
[14:53:52] <wjp> it shouldn't be exploitable
[14:54:30] <Colourless> well, no, it's problem is not too much data, but a lack of data :-)
[14:55:57] <Colourless> the problem though is going to get twisted by the internet. the crash keyword has nothing to do with ie crashing :-)
[15:00:17] * Eclair is back (gone 09:33:19)
[16:28:15] * Eclair is away: doing work
[17:08:42] * Eclair is back (gone 00:40:27)
[17:27:06] --- Darke is now known as DarkeZzz