[01:49:55] <font color="#616161">travis-ci: exult/exult#602 (snapshot-v1.7.0.20210306 - bf5fafb : DominusExult): The build passed.</font><BR>
[01:49:55] <font color="#616161">travis-ci: Change view : https://github.com/exult/exult/compare/snapshot-v1.7.0.20210306</font><BR>
[01:49:55] <font color="#616161">travis-ci: Build details : https://travis-ci.com/exult/exult/builds/219178686</font><BR>
[12:00:10] <font color="#600060">Dominus:</font> I really wasn't expecting Exult Studio to link against Fluidsynth... wreaked some havoc with my bundler magic :)<BR>
[12:15:32] <font color="#600060">Dominus:</font> Marzo, why is hg added in the macos workflow?<BR>
[12:33:37] <font color="#005000">Marzo:</font> I think it is because of SDL<BR>
[12:34:27] <font color="#600060">Dominus:</font> at least with up to date brew it *should* no longer be needed, since SDL2 --head is being pulled from git now<BR>
[12:38:47] <font color="#005000">Marzo:</font> Speaking of fluidsynth, I found the soundfonts I was using before<BR>
[12:39:10] <font color="#600060">Dominus:</font> oh great! how deep did you need to dig? :)<BR>
[12:39:48] <font color="#005000">Marzo:</font> It was in the HD of my linux laptop, so I just had to grab them<BR>
[12:41:03] <font color="#005000">Marzo:</font> And the logs do confirm that brew is pulling SDL from git<BR>
[14:20:24] <font color="#600060">Dominus:</font> brew pull request for mt32emu in review<BR>
[15:47:13] <font color="#600060">Dominus:</font> Mt32emu in brew is not likely to happen. They insist on a test block in their formula with a simple test for one of the functions.<BR>
[15:47:51] <font color="#600060">Dominus:</font> Not interested in spending time on this nitpickery and IMO senselessness for libraries<BR>
[16:52:30] <font color="#600060">Dominus:</font> https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/pull/72618 yep, I'm done ;)<BR>
[17:15:10] <font color="#600060">Dominus:</font> I'm feeling quite angry/disappointed at brew. For claiming to be the easiest uncomplicated package manager for macOS, they sure have the most anal process to get something approved <BR>
[22:07:32] <font color="#005000">Marzo:</font> To be fair, it is kind of understandable<BR>
[22:08:23] <font color="#005000">Marzo:</font> A few months ago, there was a package in msys2 (libgd) which has a library and a few command line utilities to convert images to a few formats supported by the Lua scripting language<BR>
[22:08:34] <font color="#005000">Marzo:</font> It was there for quite a while<BR>
[22:09:10] <font color="#005000">Marzo:</font> I ended up submitting a bug report for it because the msys2 package was all but useless<BR>
[22:09:31] <font color="#005000">Marzo:</font> There were config options to disable all of the formats, and these config options were turned on the msys2 package<BR>
[22:09:58] <font color="#005000">Marzo:</font> And so you simply could not do anything with the package because it would print an error saying that the format was not supported<BR>
[22:10:17] <font color="#005000">Marzo:</font> If there was a test for the package, it would have been caught early on<BR>
[22:10:32] <font color="#005000">Marzo:</font> So asking for tests is a good thing -- they care about quality<BR>
[22:11:03] <font color="#005000">Marzo:</font> And to be frank, if we had (or could make) tests for most stuff on Exult, the rate of regressions would be a lot smaller<BR>
[22:11:22] <font color="#005000">Marzo:</font> In a very real sense, we are in the wrong here<BR>
[22:11:49] <font color="#005000">Marzo:</font> Anyways, off to bed<BR>