Exult Forum

Posted: **Tue Jan 03, 2017 11:07 pm**

Is there a way to do a goto in Usecode C? For example I'm playing with the Copy Protection function, and it loops back to the top until the number of questions answered correctly is above 3. But there's no equivalent in Usecode C?

Posted: **Wed Jan 04, 2017 6:59 pm**

You can use while or do...while for this purpose; it is better than using a goto, and you can almost always restructure the code to use one of them instead (in FoV, I think only LB's usecode needs a slight twist to rewrite without a goto).

UCC does support goto statements and labels; but here is something to keep in mind about goto.

Posted: **Wed Jan 04, 2017 8:00 pm**

Thank you Marzo. Is there a good example in any of the official mods I can look at?

Posted: **Thu Jan 05, 2017 1:59 pm**

None of them use it; but it is like ucxt output:

Code: Select all

loop_start:
    //code
    if (stuff) {
        goto loop_break;
    }
    // more code
    goto loop_start;
loop_break:

Which can be done as:

Code: Select all

    while (true) {
        //code
        if (stuff) {
            break;
        }
        // more code
    }

Really, there is nothing to be gained by using goto. And using it is a guaranteed reject on any pull requests, in case you are wondering.

Posted: **Thu Jan 05, 2017 4:05 pm**

I'd much rather use while or do just out of avoiding bad habits. That's what I was hoping for an example on. Looks like it is used in the Keyring mod but not SIfixes.

Posted: **Fri Jan 06, 2017 11:09 am**

Here is a bit more information on while and do...while, then:

Code: Select all

    do {
        // code
        if (condition1) {
            break;        // Exits the loop
        } else if (condition2) {
            continue;       // Goes back to the 'do'
        }
        // more code
    } while (condition3);

    while (condition1) {
        // code
        if (condition2) {
            break;        // Exits the loop
        } else if (condition3) {
            continue;       // Goes back to the 'while'
        }
        // more code
    }

'continue' and 'break' are also supported inside 'for', 'converse'; 'break' is also supported in 'switch' statements.

Posted: **Wed Jan 11, 2017 6:06 am**

I'm stuck on fixing Pomdirgun's code, where he has an event == DEATH but it loops back to STARTED_TALKING if you haven't talked to him yet. When I try to do this as close to the original code as possible, killing him freezes the Exult engine. I want to see flag 0xCC for his death, but it's not working. I'd like to be able to run his conversation if it doesn't occur prior to his DEATH.

Otherwise I have him fully reimplemented.

Posted: **Wed Jan 11, 2017 6:17 am**

I think I figured this out, I was trying to "do it right" by simplifying it but the original code works better.

Posted: **Wed Jan 11, 2017 7:11 pm**

Missing quotes on a set_npc_name string got me. Added this feature request:
https://sourceforge.net/p/exult/feature-requests/187/

Posted: **Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:18 pm**

Are you sure you don't just have a variable or function with that name? UCC simply does not work like that, it would try to find a variable or function with that name (spitting out an error if there was neither) and Exult would then try to interpret what was given as a string, probably with bad results.

Posted: **Thu Jan 12, 2017 9:35 pm**

You're right as usual. The name I was setting was the same as used in the function name. Would it be best practice to use funcName instead of just Name? Or npcName?

Posted: **Tue Jan 31, 2017 4:24 am**

As I've been hacking my mod, I've been using these conventions:

shapeName
npcName
spellName
eggName
cutsceneName (these are sometimes in shape code but usually egg code)

The do / continue / break is handy for converting the antechamber ambush code, for example. It uses a loop between x-left and x-right to place each energy field.

The game start rabbit code also uses a loop to clear some NPC flags. That's why setting some flags in ES for SI+SS won't stay through a game start.

Exult Forum

goto in Usecode C?

goto in Usecode C?

Re: goto in Usecode C?

Re: goto in Usecode C?

Re: goto in Usecode C?

Re: goto in Usecode C?

Re: goto in Usecode C?

Re: goto in Usecode C?

Re: goto in Usecode C?

Re: goto in Usecode C?

Re: goto in Usecode C?

Re: goto in Usecode C?

Re: goto in Usecode C?